CO129-459 - Individuals - 1919 — Page 80

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

15. bag net we

Dad had c♦

ANKE DJ Touro at está

Now! Janga

ecord 1.33.

18.

Upon the arrival of the Respondent Mr. Hallifax, he interviewed the Appellant in accordance with section 4, sub-section (8) of the Ordinance and questioned him in accordance with the provisions of that sub-section and with Form No. 2 of the Schedule. The questions and the Appellant's answers will be found set out at pages 134 and 155 of the Record. The allegations mentioned in question 3 will be found at page 132 of the Record. The allegations against the Appellant were that he had made a practice of champerty, the institution of fraudulent claims, the preparation of false evidence, improper exploitation of litigants, dishonest conduct of litigation and the proceedings incidental thereto, and three specific instances of cases of misconduct were charged.

19.

The Appellant's answers to the allegations were a denial. He further asked to be confronted with the witnesses. In answer to question 6 as to what witnesses or other evidence he had to adduce, he mentioned Mr. d'Almada E. Castro and Fr. Gordon Potter, a member of the Hongkong Bar. He stated that he could not then remember any further witnesses. The Respondent Mr. Hallifax urged him, if possible, to give the names of all his witnesses since if the names were given,

Edit History

2026-06-14 06:02:39 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

15. bag net we1.78Dad had c♦ANKE DJ Touro at estáNow! Jangaecord 1.33.18.Upon the arrival of the Respondent Mr. Hallifax, he interviewed the Appellant in accordance with section 4, sub-section (8) of the Ordinance and questioned him in accordance with the provisions of that sub-section and with Form No. 2 of the Schedule. The questions and the Appellant's answers will be found set out at pages 134 and 155 of the Record. The allegations mentioned in question 3 will be found at page 132 of the Record. The allegations against the Appellant were that he had made a practice of champerty, the institution of fraudulent claims, the preparation of false evidence, improper exploitation of litigants, dishonest conduct of litigation and the proceedings incidental thereto, and three specific instances of cases of misconduct were charged.19.The Appellant's answers to the allegations were a denial. He further asked to be confronted with the witnesses. In answer to question 6 as to what witnesses or other evidence he had to adduce, he mentioned Mr. d'Almada E. Castro and Fr. Gordon Potter, a member of the Hongkong Bar. He stated that he could not then remember any further witnesses. The Respondent Mr. Hallifax urged him, if possible, to give the names of all his witnesses since if the names were given,

Baseline (Original)

15. bag net we1.78Dad had c♦ANKE DJ Touro at estáNow! Jangaecord 1.33.18.Upon the arrival of the Respondent Mr. Hallifax he interviewed the Appellant in accordance with section 4 sub-section (8) of the ordinance and questioned him in accordance with the provisions of that aub-section and with Form No. 2 of the Schedule. The questions and the Appellants answers will be found set out at pages 134 and 155 of the Record. The allegations mentioned in question 3 will be found at page 132 of the Record. The allegations against the Appellant were that he had made a practice of champerty, the institution of fraudulent claims, the preparation of false evidence, improper exploitation of litigante, dishonest conduct of litigation and the proceed-ings incidental thereto and three mecific instmoes of*** Cutt cases of misconduct were charged.19.The Appellant's answers to the allegations were a denialIn He further asked to be confronted with the witnesses. answer to question 6 as to what witnesses or other evidence he had to adduce he mentioned Mr. d'Almada E.Castro and Fr. ildon Potter a member of the Hongkong Bar. He stated that he could not then remember any further witnesses. The Respondent Mr. Hallifax urged him if possible to give the names of all his witnesses since if the names were given7T

2026-06-14 06:02:39 · Baseline

View content

15. bag net we

Dad had c♦

ANKE DJ Touro at está

Now! Janga

ecord 1.33.

18.

Upon the arrival of the Respondent Mr. Hallifax he

interviewed the Appellant in accordance with section 4

sub-section (8) of the ordinance and questioned him in

accordance with the provisions of that aub-section and with

Form No. 2 of the Schedule. The questions and the

Appellants answers will be found set out at pages 134 and

155 of the Record. The allegations mentioned in question

3 will be found at page 132 of the Record. The allegations

against the Appellant were that he had made a practice of

champerty, the institution of fraudulent claims, the

preparation of false evidence, improper exploitation of

litigante, dishonest conduct of litigation and the proceed-

ings incidental thereto and three mecific instmoes of

*** Cutt

cases of misconduct were charged.

19.

The Appellant's answers to the allegations were a denial

He further asked to be confronted with the witnesses.

answer to question 6 as to what witnesses or other evidence

he had to adduce he mentioned Mr. d'Almada E.Castro and Fr.

ildon Potter a member of the Hongkong Bar. He stated that

he could not then remember any further witnesses. The

Respondent Mr. Hallifax urged him if possible to give the

names of all his witnesses since if the names were given

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.